Hartog v. Hartog

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing that the legis lative history of New York’s Domestic Relations Law indicates an intent to “treat the marriage as an economic partnership and, in so doing, to recognize the direct and indirect contributions of each spouse, including homemakers.”
• “if the cohabitant does not pay a fair share of the household expenses, then it follows that part of the support payment supports the cohabitant rather than the ex-spouse”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).