Skip to main content

Hartness v. Bush

Citations

  • 712 F. Supp. 986
  • 1989 WL 55589

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “while Skinner and Von Raab abandoned any requirement for particularized, individualized suspicion as a predicate for random testing, the fact bound opinions require substantial generalized suspicion”
  • “reasonable, articulable, and individualized suspicion of use of drugs on-duty or off-duty causing a reasonable suspicion that a specific employee may be under the influence of drugs while on-duty”
  • Executive Office of the President and General Services Administration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oberdorfer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hartness v. Bush

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.