Hartman v. United Heritage Property & Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the basis of the prohibition on direct actions is that the person allegedly injured by the insured is not a party to the insurance contract and has no rights under it
• noting that the basis of the prohibition on direct actions is that the person allegedly injured by the insured is not a party to the insurance contract and has no rights under it
• noting the court’s prior holding that if there is a question whether the insurance company has a duty to defend or to indemnify, the proper course of action is to file a declaratory judgment action prior to the resolution of the underlying lawsuit
• insured’s assignee may sue insurer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).