Skip to main content
· 12/11/1965

Hartman v. Stumbo

Citations

  • 408 P.2d 693
  • 195 Kan. 634
  • 1965 Kan. LEXIS 448

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a cause of action for unjust enrichment accrued when payment was made to defendant
  • concluding that a cause of action for unjust enrichment accrued when payment was made to defendant
  • \The burden remains always upon an appellant to show error in the ruling he seeks to overturn.\
  • unjust enrichment not dependent on concomitant fraud claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.