Hartman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there was sufficient evidence to give rise to an inference the defendant exerted unauthorized control when store employees caught defendant with merchandise concealed under his jacket a few feet from the store doors
• holding there was sufficient evidence to give rise to an inference the defendant exerted unauthorized control for purpose of committing theft when store employees caught defendant with merchandise concealed under his jacket a few feet from the store doors
• evidence that defendant was found near the door of the store with a shirt he did not pay for hidden under his jacket was sufficient to support conviction for theft

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chambliss v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-04-24· cited 44×
• State v. King
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1987-01-29· cited 21×
• Wilson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-10-18· cited 11×
• Phillips v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1977-11-16· cited 8×
• Mahoney v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1979-04-26· cited 7×
• Matthew C. Elzey, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-11-30
• India Covington v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-01-31

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Spivey v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1971-10-22· cited 66×
• Brown v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1970-08-10· cited 16×
• CARPENTER v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1968-11-13· cited 9×
• Cody v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1973-12-28· cited 4×
• Hogan v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1973-12-28· cited 1×