Skip to main content
· 1/12/1984

Hartman v. Smith

Citations

  • 674 P.2d 176
  • 100 Wash. 2d 766
  • 1984 Wash. LEXIS 1444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e have held agreements between parents regarding modification of prospective support invalid as against public policy.”
  • equitable estoppel operates to bar respondent's claim for past due child support
  • equitable estoppel precludes the exercise of a right which might otherwise have existed
  • estoppel barred mother's claim for reimbursement for moneys expended on behalf of the child where she represented that upon adoption of the child by stepfather, he would no longer have duty to provide child support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Utter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.