Hartman v. Rogers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a client had notice of past malpractice when he was shown a document that indicated false testimony and that the client had “actual knowledge” of the document when it was drafted
• \The standard for accrual of the cause of action is 'legally cognizable' not 'final disposition'.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).