Hartman v. Ouellette Plumbing & Heating Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that extent of claimant’s original injury was not reasonably discoverable until after a subsequent injury occurred; therefore statute of limitations did not begin to run until that time
• adopting “reasonably discoverable and apparent” standard for purposes of computing when statute of limitations begins to run in workers’ compensation cases
• “any proceeding for worker’s compensation benefits is an action in contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).