Hartman v. Hosmer
Citations
- 65 Kan. 595
- 70 P. 598
- 1902 Kan. LEXIS 96
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Conveyance — Fraud—Burden of Proof . In an action to subject property to the payment of debts, which it is alleged had been sold or conveyed with the fraudulent intent to hinder, delay and defraud creditors, the burden of proving the existence of fraud is on him who asserts it. He must not only show that such was the intent of the vendor, but also show that the purchaser had knowledge thereof or had knowledge of facts that would arouse the suspicions of an ordinarily prudent man.</p> <p>2. Practice, District Court — Objections to Special Questions. Where objections are made to all the special questions requested by one party, and no specific objection is made to any separate question, and some of such questions are proper and should be > submitted, held, that it is not error to overrule such objections.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] stockholder may [sue the corporation to] enjoin the making of a usurious contract” or a ultra vires act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greene
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.