Skip to main content
· 10/21/2013

Hartman v. Dana Holding Corp.

Citations

  • 978 F. Supp. 2d 957
  • 57 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1144
  • 2013 WL 5707241
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150747

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] court may refuse to take judicial notice of facts that are irrelevant to the proceeding or (in certain contexts) otherwise excludable under the Federal Rules.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cosbey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.