· 10/21/2013
Hartman v. Dana Holding Corp.
Citations
- 978 F. Supp. 2d 957
- 57 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1144
- 2013 WL 5707241
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150747
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] court may refuse to take judicial notice of facts that are irrelevant to the proceeding or (in certain contexts) otherwise excludable under the Federal Rules.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cosbey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.