Skip to main content
· 5/3/2000

Hartman v. Baker

Citations

  • 766 A.2d 347
  • 6 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 126
  • 2000 Pa. Super. 140
  • 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the WPCL only “establishes an employee’s right to enforce payment of wages and compensation to which an employee is otherwise entitled by the terms of an agreement.”
  • stating that the WPCL only “establishes an employee’s right to enforce payment of wages and compensation to which an employee is otherwise entitled by the terms of an agreement.”
  • stating WPCL “establishes an employee’s right to enforce payment of wages and compensation to which an employee is otherwise entitled by the terms of an agreement.”
  • stating employer required to prove good faith by clear and convincing evidence
  • assuming, without deciding, employer bore burden of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Popovich, Joyce, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.