· 5/3/2000
Hartman v. Baker
Citations
- 766 A.2d 347
- 6 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 126
- 2000 Pa. Super. 140
- 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 631
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the WPCL only “establishes an employee’s right to enforce payment of wages and compensation to which an employee is otherwise entitled by the terms of an agreement.”
- stating that the WPCL only “establishes an employee’s right to enforce payment of wages and compensation to which an employee is otherwise entitled by the terms of an agreement.”
- stating WPCL “establishes an employee’s right to enforce payment of wages and compensation to which an employee is otherwise entitled by the terms of an agreement.”
- stating employer required to prove good faith by clear and convincing evidence
- assuming, without deciding, employer bore burden of proof
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Popovich, Joyce, Brosky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.