Hartley v. Rubio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff “must offer more than . . . conclusory allegations that the defendants’ proffered reasons were false”
• finding that plaintiff “must offer more than . . . conclusory allegations that the defendants’ proffered reasons were false”
• dismissing retaliation and discrimination claims where notice only included allegations relating to claims for assault and battery
• finding “that defendants have met their burden of articulating a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for reassigning and terminating [plaintiff]” because defendants asserted the plaintiff “acted in an insubordinate fashion” and “was unprofessional and disruptive”
• “[A plaintiff] must offer more than self-serving and conclusory allegations that the defendants’ proffered reasons were false.”
• “It is well-settled that an employer may permissibly terminate an employee based on inappropriate comments, perceived insubordination, or disruptive behavior in the workplace.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).