Mississippi Supreme Court· 10/21/1993
Hartle v. Packard Elec.
Citations
- 626 So. 2d 106
- 1993 WL 429282
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a disclaimer in an employer’s handbook preserves the employer’s right to terminate an employee at-will
- holding that disclaimer in handbook preserved employer's right to terminate employee at will
- holding that employee handbook containing warning that policies and procedures contained therein did not constitute legal contract, did not alter the at-will status of employment relationship and did not limit employer's discretion to discharge except for just cause
- upholding summary judgment for employer because express disclaimer in handbook 3 negated contract claim
- handbook specifically stating that an employee can be terminated \at will\ preserves the employment at will status
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dan M. Lee, P.J., and Pittman and James L. Roberts, Jr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- City of Midland v. O'BRYANTTexas Supreme Court· 2000-06-15· cited 179×
- Lee v. Golden Triangle Planning & Development DistrictMississippi Supreme Court· 2001-01-18· cited 62×
- Cothern v. Vickers, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court· 2000-05-25· cited 54×
- Brown v. Inter-City Federal BankCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 1999-01-26· cited 35×
- Morrison v. MSETCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2001-05-08· cited 34×
- Raiola v. Chevron USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2004-02-24· cited 29×
- McDaniel v. Mississippi Baptist Medical CenterS.D. Mississippi· 1994-11-29· cited 18×
- McCrory v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 1999-05-18· cited 14×
- Lippincott v. Miss. Bureau of NarcoticsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2003-04-08· cited 14×
- Cooper v. Drexel Chemical Co.N.D. Mississippi· 1996-04-22· cited 12×
- Slatery v. NE MISS. CONTRACT PROCUREMENTMississippi Supreme Court· 1999-09-16· cited 12×
- Byrd v. Imperial Palace of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2001-12-06· cited 12×
- Jones v. City of HattiesburgCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2017-01-10· cited 10×
- Dandridge v. Chromcraft Corp.N.D. Mississippi· 1996-01-24· cited 7×
- Young v. North Mississippi Medical CenterMississippi Supreme Court· 2001-01-25· cited 6×
- Eaves v. K-Mart Corp.S.D. Mississippi· 2001-06-07· cited 3×
- Smith v. Gencorp, Inc.N.D. Mississippi· 1997-07-14· cited 2×
- Valle v. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc.S.D. Mississippi· 1996-07-18· cited 1×
- McCool v. COAHOMA OPPORTUNITIES, INC.Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2010-10-05· cited 1×
- Sara M. Slatery v. Northeast Mississippi Contract Procurement, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1998-12-04
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Reid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Sixth Circuit· 1986-04-28· cited 395×
- John Staren and David Henner v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, a CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1976-02-03· cited 156×
- Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court· 1899-02-20· cited 140×
- Barry L. Conrad v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. And Air Line Pilots Association, InternationalSeventh Circuit· 1974-04-12· cited 116×
- Perry v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1987-05-27· cited 101×
- Rape v. Mobile & O. R. R.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1924-06-16· cited 52×
- Shirl E. Hartle v. Packard Electric, Etc.Fifth Circuit· 1989-08-10· cited 35×
- Samples v. Hall of Mississippi, Inc.N.D. Mississippi· 1987-07-21· cited 10×
- Windfield v. Groen Division, Dover Corp.S.D. Mississippi· 1990-04-27· cited 4×
- Atlanta Stove Works v. HamiltonMississippi Supreme Court· 1903-10-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.