Hartland Lakeside Joint No. 3 School District v. Wea Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the Grable inquiry and finding no jurisdiction because, in part, “even from [plaintiffs] perspective, the case contains non-trivial issues” of state law
• “Many things comply with federal law but violate state law. To displace state law, federal law must require a particular course of action at odds with state rules.... ”
• “ERISA … may contain the broadest preemption clause of any federal statute and completely occupies the field of employees’ health and welfare benefits … .”
• “ERISA . . . may contain the broadest preemption clause of any federal statute and completely occupies the field of employees’ health and welfare benefits . . . .”
• “ERISA . . . may contain the broadest preemption clause of any federal statute and completely occupies the field of employees’ health and welfare benefits . . . .”
• the McCarran-Ferguson Act “gives states preeminence in the domain of insurance regulation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).