Skip to main content
· 1/20/1982

Hartigan v. Pine Lake Village Apartment Co. (In Re Pine Lake Village Apartment Co.)

Citations

  • 16 B.R. 750
  • 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 5018
  • 8 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \it defies credulity to say that the debtor's interest would be better served by dismissal when the debtor voluntarily sought the mechanics of Chapter 11 for the purpose of rehabilitation and a fresh start\
  • “It defies credulity to say that the debtor’s interest would be better served by a dismissal when the debtor voluntarily sought the mechanics of Chapter 11 for the purpose of rehabilitation and a fresh start.”
  • rejecting the abstention request under § 305 as premature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard Schwartzberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.