Skip to main content
· 2/1/1971

Harthcock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Citations

  • 248 So. 2d 456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff could stack multiple policies in order to fully recover
  • allowing aggregation of coverage of plaintiff as a passenger on uninsured motorcycle with plaintiff's own vehicle
  • construed uninsured motorist statute to allow subrogation only when the injured party had recovered from the uninsured motorist
  • “The coverage afforded by these policies is mandatory under the statute and may not be cut down by a policy exclusion.”
  • \In uninsured motorist insurance the insured is the injured party.\
  • \In uninsured motorist insurance the insured is the injured party.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillespie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.