Skip to main content
· 3/22/1994

Hartford v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Citations

  • 870 P.2d 1202
  • 178 Ariz. 106
  • 161 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 19
  • 1994 Ariz. App. LEXIS 51

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Mutual assent is based on objective evidence, not on the hidden intent of the parties.”
  • “Mutual assent is based on objective evidence, not on the hidden intent of the parties.”
  • “Any ambiguity is 7 subject to a factual determination concerning the intent of the parties and is to be resolved 8 conclusively by the trier of fact.”
  • “Whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law. Any ambiguity is subject to a factual determination concerning the intent of the parties and is to be resolved conclusively by the trier of fact.”
  • “Adequate consideration consists of any performance which is bargained for”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gerber, McGregor, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.