· 1/5/1931
Hartford & New York Transp. Co. v. Rogers & Hubbard Co.
Citations
- 47 F.2d 189
- 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3426
- 1931 A.M.C. 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that nonappearance by a party who failed to receive notice was a sufficient showing under ORCP 71B, which contains identical grounds for relief from a default judgment
- error to not set aside judgment against mother in custody proceedings on the grounds of “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect” under ORCP 71 B when the court mistakenly failed to notify mother of the time and place of a hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hand
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.