Skip to main content
· 1/5/1931

Hartford & New York Transp. Co. v. Rogers & Hubbard Co.

Citations

  • 47 F.2d 189
  • 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3426
  • 1931 A.M.C. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that nonappearance by a party who failed to receive notice was a sufficient showing under ORCP 71B, which contains identical grounds for relief from a default judgment
  • error to not set aside judgment against mother in custody proceedings on the grounds of “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect” under ORCP 71 B when the court mistakenly failed to notify mother of the time and place of a hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hand

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.