· 10/8/2008
Hartford Fire Insurance v. United States
Citations
- 544 F.3d 1289
- 30 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1513
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21054
- 2008 WL 4490009
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that all theories of defense which could lead to the cancellation of a Customs charge are protestable under section 1514(a)(3)
- affirming the trial court’s decision to look to the true nature of the action in determining jurisdiction
- “In subsection 1581(a), Congress set out an express scheme for administrative and judicial review of Customs’ actions.”
- “[W]e must look to the true nature of the action in a district court in determining jurisdiction.”
- “[T]he trial court was correct to look to the true nature of the action in determining jurisdiction at the outset.”
- “[W]e must look to the true nature of the action in a district court in determining jurisdiction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mayer, Lourie, Prost
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.