Skip to main content
· 10/8/2008

Hartford Fire Insurance v. United States

Citations

  • 544 F.3d 1289
  • 30 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1513
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21054
  • 2008 WL 4490009

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that all theories of defense which could lead to the cancellation of a Customs charge are protestable under section 1514(a)(3)
  • affirming the trial court’s decision to look to the true nature of the action in determining jurisdiction
  • “In subsection 1581(a), Congress set out an express scheme for administrative and judicial review of Customs’ actions.”
  • “[W]e must look to the true nature of the action in a district court in determining jurisdiction.”
  • “[T]he trial court was correct to look to the true nature of the action in determining jurisdiction at the outset.”
  • “[W]e must look to the true nature of the action in a district court in determining jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mayer, Lourie, Prost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.