Hartford Fire Insurance v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that expert's choice-based conjoint analysis measuring consumer willingness-to-pay satisfied reliability requirements of Daubert
• rejecting conjoint analysis damages model because it \completely ignores the price for which NJOY is willing to sell its products\
• rejecting under Comcast a model that focused “solely on the consumer’s subjective valuation” “without considering other factors in a functioning marketplace”
• rejecting under Comcast a model that focused “solely on the consumer’s subjective valuation” “without considering other factors in a functioning marketplace”
• rejecting a survey as dispositive of materiality, in a predominance analysis, where it “did not ask respondents questions relevant in assessing the materiality of information omitted from the packaging”
• finding lack of a control group alone does not render a survey inadmissible and 12 summarizing cases excluding expert testimony where other survey flaws were present

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).