Hartford-Carlisle Savings Bank v. Shivers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that in cases of de minimis violations of Article 9, proper remedy is to deduct debtor’s damages against any deficiency left after foreclosure and sale
• stating that, in deciding whether to follow the setoff approach, “[t]he question is whether [the statutory remedy] is the exclusive remedy”
• stating “[t]his court has repeatedly held that it neither has a duty nor the authority to render advisory opinions”
• listing “to insure . . . [an] opportunity to redeem” as one of the “important purposes” of the statutory notice requirement
• “This court has repeatedly held that it neither has a duty nor the authority to render advisory opinions.”
• \This court has repeatedly held that it neither has a duty nor the authority to render advisory opinions.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).