Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Sequoia Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that one policy described the vehicle at issue but nevertheless 28 considering whether another policy “also describe[d] or rate[d] the” vehicle
• holding that business auto policy that \specifically describe[d] as one of the insured vehicles the 1976 Chevrolet Blazer involved in the accident\ was primary under section 11580.9(d)
• awarding prejudgment interest from the date plaintiff paid to settle a claim in full even though the defendants’ legal liability obligating them to contribute to the settlement was not established until the entry of summary judgment
• awarding prejudgment interest from the date plaintiff paid to settle a claim in full even though the defendants’ legal liability obligating them to contribute to the settlement was not established until the entry of summary judgment
• “ ‘While it is the rule that several contracts relating to the same matters are to be construed together ... it does not follow that for all purposes they constitute one contract.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).