Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying summary judgment to an insurer “in light of the inferences of unreasonableness or self-service that can be drawn” from the details of its post-settlement allocation
• “[W]hile the fact that [the parties] have been represented by . . . the same counsel is considered in the privity analysis, . . . Hartford has not carried its burden of demonstrating that Columbia is in privity with Continental.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).