Skip to main content
· 5/6/1986

HARTFORD ACC. & INDEM. INS. v. Wash. Nat. Ins.

Citations

  • 638 F. Supp. 78

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]ll courts to speak on the matter have found the industry-wide definition of ‘dishonest and fraudulent acts’ to be unambiguous; that definition excludes recovery for losses resulting from an employee’s intent to obtain a financial benefit for himself from commissions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Getzendanner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.