Hart v. Vermont Investment Ltd. Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing the “substantive rules of contract law” relating to a lease de novo, specifically whether there was a “meeting of the minds”
• “In this case, given the sophistication of the negotiating parties, and the arm’s length bargaining which occurred, we cannot say [the plaintiff] was denied a meaningful choice.”
• “A party’s ‘claimed intent is immaterial, where it has agreed in writing to a clearly expressed and unambiguous intent to the contrary.’” (quoting Ray v. William G. Eurice & Bros., Inc., 93 A.2d 272, 278 (Md. 1952))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).