Skip to main content
· 6/28/1996

Hart v. Steel Products, Inc.

Citations

  • 666 N.E.2d 1270
  • 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 828
  • 1996 WL 355330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence supported the trial court's finding that an individual, as an agent of a corporation, committed fraud by misrepresenting the company's financial position as a basis for piercing the corporate veil of the corporation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chezem, Darden, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.