· 6/28/1996
Hart v. Steel Products, Inc.
Citations
- 666 N.E.2d 1270
- 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 828
- 1996 WL 355330
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that evidence supported the trial court's finding that an individual, as an agent of a corporation, committed fraud by misrepresenting the company's financial position as a basis for piercing the corporate veil of the corporation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chezem, Darden, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.