Hart v. Police Jury of Parish of Tangipahoa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[h]ere, the fact that [p]laintiff and her colleagues are all teachers is not enough” to plead that the colleagues were similarly situated for purposes of disparate-treatment claim
• explaining that courts consider the underlying conduct in connection with an alleged failure to accommodate and that the failure to accommodate itself is insufficient to establish an adverse employment action
• applying the same standard to hostile work environment claims under § 1981 as under Title VII
• dismissing a retaliation claim where Plaintiff failed to identify a materially adverse employment action sufficient to withstand dismissal
• dismissing claims because the plaintiff did not allege that a hostile work environment was created and existed because of her protected status
• dismissing ADA claims against individual defendants because “an individual cannot be liable for discrimination or retaliation claims under the ADA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).