Hart v. Knox County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that rule governing time limit for filing appeals “does not affect substantive rights, but relates to practice and procedure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bendix Aviation Corp. v. Glass
  Third Circuit· 1952-02-19· cited 64×
• In re Town of Killington
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2003-10-24· cited 51×
• Lopinsky v. Hertz Drive-Ur-Self Systems, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1951-12-10· cited 38×
• Preston v. ætna Life Ins. Co.
  Seventh Circuit· 1949-04-14· cited 30×
• United States v. Cato Brothers, Inc., Wilfred R. Cato, William R. Cato, and Magie L. Dunn (Nee Magie L. Stone)
  Fourth Circuit· 1959-12-14· cited 28×
• Mason v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1959-01-14· cited 7×
• Brainard v. Joy Mfg. Co.
  U.S. District Court· 1949-08-03· cited 3×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. Murphree
  Supreme Court· 1946-01-02· cited 481×