Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 4/26/1999

Hart v. Gomez

Citations

  • 174 F.3d 1067
  • 1999 WL 239365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel’s failure to review key documents corroborating a defense witness’s testimony constituted deficient performance
  • holding that counsel’s failure to review key documents corroborating defense wit- ness’s testimony constituted deficient performance
  • ineffectiveness portion of Strickland test satisfied where “no reasonable strategy. . . could account for defense counsel’s failure to introduce this [readily available] corroborating evidence”
  • counsel’s failure to introduce documents that corroborated testimony crucial to the defense amounted to deficient performance
  • “Hart’s counsel ‘failed to fulfill his duty to investigate [Hart’s] most important defense.’” (alteration in original) (quoting Sanders v. Ratelle, 21 F.3d 1446, 1457 (9th Cir. 1994))
  • “A lawyer who fails adequately to investigate, and to introduce into evidence, records that demonstrate his client’s factual innocence, or that raise sufficient doubt as to that question to undermine confidence in the verdict, renders deficient performance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hart v. Gomez

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.