Hart v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that there is no express or implied right to sue fund recipients under HAMP because HAMP does not create a private right of action
• granting lender’s motion for summary judgment and rejecting Ms. Hart’s assertions accusing the lender of, inter alia, bad faith and misrepresentation
• “There is no express or implied right to sue fund recipients . . . under TARP.”
• “[T]hird[]party beneficiaries cannot enforce government contracts absent a clear intent to the contrary, and . . . HAMP expresses no such intent[.]” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• “There is no express or implied right to sue fund recipients ... under TARP.”
• “[T]hird[]party beneficiaries cannot enforce government contracts absent a clear intent to the contrary, and . . . HAMP expresses no such intent[.]” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).