Hart v. City of Groveland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the Hough “windfall” rationale in a case in which various individuals contributed to the prevailing party’s attorney’s fees
• questioning \whether it makes sense to require a motion\ under rule 1.525 when a court enters a judgment granting fees and costs \and all that remains is a determination of the reasonable amount\
• “[A]n extension of time to file a motion for costs and attorney’s fees, provided by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.090(b) must be filed within the 30-day period, unless excusable neglect can be established.” (citing Lyn v. Lyn, 884 So.2d 181, 185 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).