Hart v. Bhat

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while ALJ did not assign specific weight to doctor’s treatment notes or mental status report, his discussion of the same was stated with sufficient clarity to review grounds for decision
• upholding the ALJ’s credibility finding, even though the claimant identified “other evidence in the record that was consistent with her hearing testimony and to which the ALJ did not specifically refer in making her credibility determination”
• “[T]he ALJ was not required to examine or reference every piece of evidence, so long as it is evident . . . that the ALJ considered [the claimant’s] medical condition as a whole.”
• “[T]he ALJ was not required to examine or reference every piece of evidence, so long as it is evident . . . that the ALJ considered [the claimant’s] medical condition as a whole.”
• “[T]he ALJ was not required to examine or reference every piece of evidence, so long as it is evident, as it is here, that the ALJ considered Brito’s medical condition as a whole.”
• “[T]he 16 ALJ was not required to examine or reference every piece of evidence, so long as it is evident, as it is here, that the ALJ considered Brito’s medical condition as a whole.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).