Skip to main content
· 11/25/1959

Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading Company

Citations

  • 346 P.2d 1101
  • 86 Ariz. 379
  • 1959 Ariz. LEXIS 186

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that ordinances adopted without compliance with state statute were “void and of no effect”
  • holding that use permit issued in violation of state statute was invalid
  • “The Board of Supervisors can exercise only those powers specifically ceded to it by the legislature.”
  • “The Board of Supervisors can exercise only those powers specifically ceded to it by the legislature.”
  • Unofficial news story held insufficient to satisfy the statutory requirement of notice
  • the failure to comply with jurisdictional notice and hearing conditions of the Zoning Act rendered the subject zoning ordinances void and did not limit the use of their property by property owners within the alleged zoned area

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Udall, Phelps, Struckmeyer, Johnson, Bernstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.