Harshman v. Board of Commissioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial courts in Ohio have discretion regarding “the form and number of questions” like those at issue here
• finding no error in readmission of guilt phase testimony from surviving victims because testimony was relevant to course-of-conduct aggravating circumstance
• “The trial court abused its discretion by refusing defense counsel’s requests to advise prospective jurors that one of the murdered victims was a three-year-old child and by refusing to allow voir dire on that fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).