Skip to main content
· 1/15/1876

Harshbarger v. Foreman

Citations

  • 81 Ill. 364

Syllabus

<p>1. Vendor's lien—as against subsequent purchaser. If a person purchases land with knowledge of the fact that his vendor is still owing a portion of the purchase money thereof, for which he has not given a note or any security, the land will he subjected to the vendor’s lien in favor of the first vendor, in the hands of such purchaser with notice.</p> <p>2. The fact of notice to a subsequent purchaser, to charge land in his hands with a vendor’s lien, in favor of a remote vendor, must he satisfactorily established. Loose, vague and uncertain evidence will not he sufficient.</p>

Judges: Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.