Skip to main content
· 12/4/1953

Harsche v. Czyz

Citations

  • 61 N.W.2d 265
  • 157 Neb. 699
  • 1953 Neb. LEXIS 133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prejudicial error to instruct jury on emotional distress in fraud case, even though damages for emotional distress recoverable for breach of promise of marriage
  • in an action for fraud, instruction permitting recovery for mental anguish and humiliation constituted prejudicial error
  • in an action for fraud, instruction permitting recovery for mental anguish and humiliation constituted prejudicial error
  • actual damages are permitted in a cause of action for fraud, recovery for mental anguish is not
  • prejudicial error to instruct jury on emotional distress in fraud case, even though damages for emotional distress recoverable for breach of promise of marriage
  • prejudicial error to instruct jury on emotional distress in fraud case, even though damages for emotional distress recoverable for breach of promise of marriage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simmons, Messmore, Yeager, Chappell, Wenke, Boslaugh, Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.