Harry Ulrich, Jr. v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting lower court's holding that union had no duty to represent former bargaining unit employees who had transferred outside the unit
• noting lower court’s holding that union had no duty to represent former bargaining unit employees who had transferred outside the unit
• finding the \existence of the plaintiffs' so-called 'state law claim' [for breach of contract] is inextricably intertwined with the CBA\
• finding the “existence of the plaintiffs’ so-called ‘state law claim’ [for breach of contract] is inextricably intertwined with the CBA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).