Harry L. Young & Sons, Inc. v. Ashton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• identifying the worker as an employee, in part, based on the fact that the employer had registered as the owner of the equipment the worker used and had overtly indicated that ownership
• “In its carefully prepared findings and order it appears that the Commission gave due consideration to the factors just listed . . . .”
• “[A]n independent contractor . . . is responsible only for [a job’s] satisfactory completion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).