Harry L. BARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ALJ did not err in refuse to 25 permit a question even though he had the discretion to allow it
• holding that a plaintiff 8 restricted to sedentary work is not automatically barred from performing all \light\ jobs when 9 plaintiff was still capable of performing a subcategory of “light” jobs
• holding that a plaintiff 10 restricted to sedentary work is not automatically barred from performing all \light\ jobs when 11 plaintiff was still capable of performing a subcategory of “light” jobs
• holding that a plaintiff 27 restricted to sedentary work is not automatically barred from performing all \light\ jobs when 28 plaintiff was still capable of performing a subcategory of “light” jobs
• holding that a plaintiff 5 restricted to sedentary work is not automatically barred from performing all “light” jobs when 6 plaintiff was still capable of performing a subcategory of “light” jobs
• concluding that 1,266 jobs are within the parameters of section 423(d)(2)(A)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).