Harry J. Diebold v. Moore McCormack Bulk Transport Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “low and liberal” Jones Act prima facie standard “works in favor of submission of issues to the jury”
• stating notice of dangerous condition and “reasonable] anticipat[ion]” of injury are necessary elements of Jones Act claim
• “Plaintiff was required to prove by a preponderance of the evidence: (1) that a 4 Although Rogers involved claims under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).