Harry Halloway v. Milwaukee County, Frank Liska, Patrick T. Sheedy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that employer’s requests that employee retire are not reference to age
• excluding “hearsay within hearsay” where the “outer layer,” but not the “inner layer,” was barred by the hearsay rule
• “[S]tatements made by … [the] defendants … are not hearsay because they are made by party opponents.”
• defendants’ comments encouraging plaintiff to retire were not enough to show that alleged harassment was age-based
• short-term failure to provide plaintiff with the offices, staff, and equipment he felt he deserved was not an actionable adverse action
• “[S]tatements made by … the defendants … are not hearsay because they are made by party opponents.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).