Harry C. Mayer Co. v. Vasquez
Citations
- 11 Teiss. 235
- 1914 La. App. LEXIS 57
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. The owner who has procured a solvent surety as required by Act 134 of 1906 and in whose hands no funds are arrested by the service of attested accounts, cannot be held liable for the claims of those who furnish material or labor upon the work. ■</p> <p>2. The service of a sworn statement of account upon .the husband of the owner, with the wife’s knowledge and in her presence, and at the house erected under the building con tract, in controversy, and which at the time of such service constitutes their residence or domicile, exhibits a fulfillment of the requirements of Act 134 of 1906 with reference to the “filing” with .the owner of such swiorn statements of account.</p>
Judges: Godchaux, Honor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.