Skip to main content
· 8/18/1994

Harry Brandt v. Vulcan, Inc.

Citations

  • 30 F.3d 752
  • 1994 WL 316920

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming denial of a sanctions motion because of plaintiff’s “failure to take action far earlier in the litigation when he first learned of other possible discovery abuses”
  • violation of an “order” found where a party failed to deliver documents it promised to turn over by á certain date
  • motion for sanctions made at trial deemed untimely when the movant “clearly possessed information indicating that defendant’s discovery responses were incomplete long before trial”
  • “Rule 37(b)(2) has been invoked only against parties who have disobeyed a discovery ruling of some sort.”
  • “Rule 37(b)(2) has been invoked only against parties who have disobeyed a discovery ruling of some sort.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Bauer, Aspen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.