Harry B. Ansell v. Green Acres Contracting Co., Inc. Paul Humberston Thomas Pisula Douglas Schiff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that if evidence could be admissible in some circumstances, we review a district court’s ruling on that evidence for abuse of discretion
• “The passage of time and purportedly changed circumstances were proper issues for counsel to argue to the jury, and for the jury to consider in weighing the evidence.”;
• “[E]vidence regarding an employer's treatment of other members of a protected class is especially relevant to the issue of the employer's discriminatory intent.”
• “We will not disturb a trial court’s exercise of discretion unless no reasonable person would adopt the district court’s view.” (citation omitted)
• “While not conclusive, an employer’s favorable treatment of other members of a protected class can create an inference that the employer lacks discriminatory intent.”
• “We will not disturb a trial court’s exercise of discretion unless no reasonable person would adopt the district court’s view.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).