Harry Allen Plyler v. Michael W. Moore, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Ex Post Facto Clause was violated where the furlough eliminated was “indistinguishable from parole”
• holding that subject matter jurisdiction is an issue that “may be raised at any time by either party or sua sponte”
• holding that issues regarding subject-matter jurisdiction “may be raised at any time by either party or sua sponte by this court”
• holding that issues regarding subject-matter jurisdiction “may be raised at any time by either party or sua sponte by this court”
• holding that issues regarding subject-matter jurisdiction “may be raised at any time by either party or sua sponte by this court”
• explaining that Rooker-Feldman principles bar district court consideration of \issues actually presented to and decided by a state court\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).