Harry Aleman v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no need for an evidentiary hearing when the petitioner “offer[ed] conjecture, not facts” that cer- tain witnesses were informants
• “the district court is entitled to consider all the circumstances in the record in determining whether a hearing should be afforded on a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition. Mere unsupported allegations cannot sustain a petitioner’s request for a hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).