Harry A. Blank v. Department of the Army

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that interviews conducted “merely to confirm and clarify information that was already contained in the record” did not deprive the employee of due process
• holding that a deciding official’s decision to subsequently interview various 13 agency employees merely to confirm and clarify information that already was contained in the record did not constitute a due process violation
• holding that a deciding official’s decision to subsequently interview various 13 agency employees merely to confirm and clarify information that already was contained in the record did not constitute a due process violation
• noting that only ex parte communications that introduce new and material information to the deciding official violate the due process requirement of notice
• finding that when a deciding official initiates ex parte communication to confirm or clarify information already contained in record, there is no due process violation
• explaining that information regarding pending charges obtained by investigatory communications that d o no more than confirm or clarify the record do not undermine an appellant’s due process right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).