Skip to main content
· 10/26/1995

Harrow Products, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Citations

  • 64 F.3d 1015

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that speculation and conjecture will not suffice to withstand a motion for summary judgment
  • vacating a prior panel decision in light of a controlling state-law ruling from the Michigan Supreme Court
  • vacating a prior panel decision in light of a controlling state-law ruling from the Michigan Supreme Court
  • theoretically possible interpretation cannot create ambiguity if interpretation is illogical in light of entire policy and reasonable expectations of parties
  • theoretically possible interpretation cannot create ambiguity if interpretation is illogical in light of entire policy and reasonable expectations of parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.