Harroll v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that modifying the probation to include the mandatory condition of electronic monitoring constituted a “more severe sentence” with “harsher terms”
• holding that a “trial court is required to impose mandatory electronic monitoring as a condition of probation” under section 948.30 for defendants previously convicted of certain unlawful sexual activity
• “Where the defendant’s sentence is incomplete because it omits a mandatory condition of probation under chapter 948 as part of the sex-offender sentence, the trial court may properly modify the defendant’s sentence within sixty days to include the condition mandated by chapter 948.”
• “Under section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2006

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).