Harrold v. McDonald
Citations
- 194 Pa. 359
- 45 A. 44
- 1900 Pa. LEXIS 392
Syllabus
<p>Contract — Abrogation of contract — Parol contract.</p> <p>In an action upon a parol contract which the plaintiff alleged had been made to take the place of a written contract which he alleged had been abrogated, a vei-dict and judgment for plaintiff will be sustained where the court properly submits the conflicting evidence to the jury, and charges as follows : “ To set aside this contract and for the plaintiff to recover hei’e, he must satisfy you by clear, precise and satisfactory evidence, and not only by clear, precise and satisfactory evidence, but he must do it by two witnesses, or one witness and facts and evidence that you think are equal to another witness on that very subject, on the abrogation of the contract, setting it aside and making a new one.”</p>
Judges: Brown, Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.